<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Spaces for Nature and People</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inthewatershed.org/2010/01/18/making-spaces-for-nature-and-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inthewatershed.org/2010/01/18/making-spaces-for-nature-and-people/</link>
	<description>Urban sustainability</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Linton</title>
		<link>http://inthewatershed.org/2010/01/18/making-spaces-for-nature-and-people/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Linton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthewatershed.org/?p=118#comment-148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m astonished at the vast massive freeway scale that puts 125 acres inside a cloverleaf... that, in and of itself concerns me. I hope it&#039;s not an entire 125 acres (half the size of Taylor Yard) inside that one teardrop on the image. 125-acres is a small town!

I think, and have written about it at L.A. Creek Freak - see http://wp.me/pi4Y0-yd - that, if we&#039;re really going to restore our watersheds to health then we need to drive less and narrow and remove these oversized roads and freeways to make way for more permeable areas.

Having said my obligatory anti-car screed, I agree that there&#039;s certainly a lot of unused real estate along and encircled by L.A.&#039;s freeways... and that much of it makes a lot of sense to use as habitat, native landscaping, bioswales, etc.

Some drawbacks include: pollution (you mention air and water - but noise pollution is also very intense along freeways) and the difficulty in getting permission for these sites. Caltrans is often very reluctant to permit projects on their property... because they nearly always have plans to expand freeway capacity... so they usually don&#039;t want other uses to pin them into their current foorprint.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m astonished at the vast massive freeway scale that puts 125 acres inside a cloverleaf&#8230; that, in and of itself concerns me. I hope it&#8217;s not an entire 125 acres (half the size of Taylor Yard) inside that one teardrop on the image. 125-acres is a small town!</p>
<p>I think, and have written about it at L.A. Creek Freak &#8211; see <a href="http://wp.me/pi4Y0-yd" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/pi4Y0-yd</a> &#8211; that, if we&#8217;re really going to restore our watersheds to health then we need to drive less and narrow and remove these oversized roads and freeways to make way for more permeable areas.</p>
<p>Having said my obligatory anti-car screed, I agree that there&#8217;s certainly a lot of unused real estate along and encircled by L.A.&#8217;s freeways&#8230; and that much of it makes a lot of sense to use as habitat, native landscaping, bioswales, etc.</p>
<p>Some drawbacks include: pollution (you mention air and water &#8211; but noise pollution is also very intense along freeways) and the difficulty in getting permission for these sites. Caltrans is often very reluctant to permit projects on their property&#8230; because they nearly always have plans to expand freeway capacity&#8230; so they usually don&#8217;t want other uses to pin them into their current foorprint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

